re: team ra - when gamushara was announced i looked at the teams and thought to myself, "oh, ra's the winner." like there was literally no doubt in my mind that whatever system was used & no matter how "impartial" it was, ra was going to win. you don't stack a team with older/more popular juniors & then expect it to lose. so, while i'm disappointed that ra won (SORRY TAIGA SORRY my taiga fan card is going to be revoked with my kenty bighead fan card), i'm not at alllll surprised. not in the least.
so, in assuming that the system would always favor ra, this also means that the system was set up to not favor the other teams. i don't for one single second believe that it was ever left up to chance. the only thing that could not be controlled/anticipated was the audience vote and, uh, how about those results, huh? if the scoring system was truly impartial, there would not be such a great disparity between what the fans thought & what the juniors thought. a few shows, okay, fine. every show? no.
It just goes to show that the scoring for the show really didn't reflect the actual support that the guys were getting. of course. because, basically, the team that was supposed to win, won. the team that was supposed to lose, lost.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2014-08-12 03:05 pm (UTC)re: team ra - when gamushara was announced i looked at the teams and thought to myself, "oh, ra's the winner." like there was literally no doubt in my mind that whatever system was used & no matter how "impartial" it was, ra was going to win. you don't stack a team with older/more popular juniors & then expect it to lose. so, while i'm disappointed that ra won (SORRY TAIGA SORRY my taiga fan card is going to be revoked with my kenty bighead fan card), i'm not at alllll surprised. not in the least.
so, in assuming that the system would always favor ra, this also means that the system was set up to not favor the other teams. i don't for one single second believe that it was ever left up to chance. the only thing that could not be controlled/anticipated was the audience vote and, uh, how about those results, huh? if the scoring system was truly impartial, there would not be such a great disparity between what the fans thought & what the juniors thought. a few shows, okay, fine. every show? no.
It just goes to show that the scoring for the show really didn't reflect the actual support that the guys were getting.
of course. because, basically, the team that was supposed to win, won. the team that was supposed to lose, lost.